The arbitrator found it was unreasonable to extend it to staff who worked “exclusively remotely” with no prospect of going to the office.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is NatPo, so play “spot the influence of the republican owning this paper” game. I like how it took a detour into “Return to Office” territory.

  • Beaver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Canadian government did the right thing with the restrictions

      • Beaver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because they will come in contact with people outside of work. We need to protect the vulnerable as much as possible.

          • Beaver@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I could also argue it’s the workplace’s responsibility to keep their workers safe.

            • yannic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Correct me if I’m wrong, but that responsibility is limited to during working hours and/or inside the workplace. (And to be clear, I’m referring to their employer, Canada Post, not the Canadian Government, who does have the right to enforce similar mandates in a Public Health Emergencies like the one we just had)