1 and 2 get grouped together, but the truth is that 2 actually has more in common with 3 than it has with 1. However, 3 doesn’t realize this, so 3 makes fun of both 1 and 2, and 1 is just utterly frustrated with the fact that both 2 and 3 don’t understand the difference.
1: abolitionism
3: grand alliance of fuck-you-ism and i-dont-careism
2: i-dont-careism but with some concessions to make it look less evil. also absorbs much of the radical power of 1, neutering 1 somewhat
3: grand alliance of fuck-you-ism and i-dont-careism
2: i-dont-careism but with some concessions to make it look less evil. also absorbs much of the radical power of 1, neutering 1 somewhat
This entire part reminds me of the unexpected and deeply disappointing defense of corporate-driven phone gambling apps under the umbrella of “dont tell me what to dooooooo” just yesterday in another comm.
What the fuck people exploiting addicts get the wall how is this controversial?
Absolutist ideology about “DON’T TELL ME WHAT TO DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO” no matter how many people are clearly and plainly hurt by unregulated and unchecked corpo gambling apps.
You hate to see it folks
