It still misses a lot of pages and I suppose some parts are not quite accurate, but I guess it can be a useful resource for interested learners.
You must log in or register to comment.
some parts are not quite accurate
That’s an understatement. Taking a glance makes me wonder if any organized effort should be started afresh.
Edit: not to be mean and imply that the current quality is horrible, but so many details are incorrect that I’m afraid the original authors wouldn’t be too happy with the amount of edits.
Ditto, but given it’s under CC-BY-SA-4 we don’t necessarily rewrite from scratch
