Yeah, based on the first one being a generic anti-war statement, I made an assumption, but I can see how you could be correct. I think that’s giving them a bit too much credit, but I see your point.
Either way, a big obvious problem with the “metaphor” (I hate to even give it that kind of credit) is that it presents Israel and Palestine as being equal with respect to the problem, they’re symmetric. That to me is what’s most lib-ignorant and gross about it.
The first one was like, okay, lame, cheesy, feel-good nonsense but largely harmless.
the second one is fucking gross though, like they just need to hug it out. fuck
it’s saying they need to smash israel to free palestine. Or maybe the lib has a different resolution pictured.
That would be a hilarious thing to do
Yeah, based on the first one being a generic anti-war statement, I made an assumption, but I can see how you could be correct. I think that’s giving them a bit too much credit, but I see your point.
Either way, a big obvious problem with the “metaphor” (I hate to even give it that kind of credit) is that it presents Israel and Palestine as being equal with respect to the problem, they’re symmetric. That to me is what’s most lib-ignorant and gross about it.
That’s a great point, I missed that.