Pixel 7a may’ve used a worse packaging material for the SOC resulting in higher heat and worse performance compared to pixel 7 and pixel 6

  • ad1tya@rammy.site
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Till today, Pixel 6a was the best. In term of performance and value for money too!

    • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Binning a chip based on its performance in the silicon lottery is VERY different from deliberately shipping a chip with worse thermals, just sayin’.

      • Rebollito@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is very different at least in paper, but for the consumer it’s more or less the same. Lower price, lower performant chip. We’ll have to wait for benchmarks to know if the downgrade is newsworthy.

        • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah if it isn’t a serious performance downgrade and doesn’t throttle hard after long periods of thermal load then the downgrade would be justified. Hopefully that’s the case.