• MastodonSmooth1367@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah I mean Pixel 8 Pro had the Samsung E7 display which was brighter and more efficient.

    The problem with efficiency is that it doesn’t always translate to massive power savings. Most component manufacturers and phone makers translate those power savings into brighter screens. So if you ran the Pixel 8 Pro at a max of 1000-1100 nits like the iPhone, it would be incredibly efficient. The problem is they put those savings into pushing the display to 1500 nits. At those max power settings you end up consuming roughly just as much power as before.

    I do think this past 2 years of displays was some sort of megapixel/nits war. The Pixel 7 Pro used the same old E4 OLED and pushed higher brightness at a huge expense of power consumption. The iPhone has been going year by year increases in brightness (thankfully Apple usually uses the latest display tech). The Pixel 8 Pro was really a star and its 2000 nits peak brightness is insane in outdoor conditions. OnePlus is out their touting their foldable with 2800 nits and promises more with the next gen of BOE display tech.

    Like at some point does it really matter how much more we get? A solid 1200 nits display that sips 2W power is probably far more beneficial than a 2500 nits 10W monster.

  • Guest_4710@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just want 120hz (or 90hz) on base models. That’s it.

    Really hope that high frequency display rumor was true.

      • axck@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s good for consumers. It forces Apple to find other features to add to make the Pro worth the purchase.

      • SACHD@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        120 Hz is plenty smooth, the software needs to catch up I’d say. iOS hasn’t been performing as well as one would expect with the quality of hardware we’ve had in recent years.

  • Dr904@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just hoping it won’t make it worse for people with PWM sensitivity.

  • jazztaprazzta@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The main reason I didn’t move to the iPhone 15 Pro is the terrible PWM of the display. It’s literally giving me headache after watching it for 5 minutes in the store. I hope the 16’s display will be much better in that regard.

    • MobilePenguins@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I came from the 11 normal to 15 Pro Max, such an upgrade, I couldn’t care less what the 16 is I’m happy with what I got

    • Fishydeals@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is that a confusing way to say refresh rate? Or are you talking a about brightness, that‘s probably controlled with a pwm signal?

      If it‘s the latter I‘m sorry to tell you apple won‘t release dimmer phones in the future. But you can always dim the brightness to levels that do not ‚fry your eyes‘.