Images are from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s interactive map.

The hydroelectric marker for Grand Coulee Dam is not to scale. It should be larger. If drawn to scale it would dwarf the nearby markers.

According to the overview, the map does not include small producers in order to limit the number of markers. For the following sources, only producers above the specified cutoffs are shown:

  • Hydropower: above 5 MW (Idaho) or 20 MW (other)
  • Natural Gas & Wind: above 10 MW
  • Biomass: above 1 MW
  • jrs100000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there a reason Hoover dam isn’t on there? With a capacity of around 2000MW it should be a pretty big circle, but it isn’t even listed in the drop down menus.

    • NAS89@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s killing me slowly. I can’t afford solar, I keep my AC at 78 during the day when I’m home and off entirely overnight, I never turn lights on in the house, and I cook only with natural gas or charcoal and I’m still facing $400/mo from May to October.

      I hit the “peak billing rate” for PG&E on the third day of the billing cycle each month and they say I just need to fork over cash for solar or reduce my energy further.

      I just need a few more years off on my mortgage and I’m going to have to sell and move back to the Southeast, I guess.

      • Hello_there@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know how we haven’t just passed a voter initiatives to get rid of pge. Enough people claim to hate them but we can’t make any changes