• AgentTasker@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Maybe there’d be less criticising of the referees if they were doing a much better job than currently are, and not having massive fuck-ups every week.

  • patmxn@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    If refereeing is so easy like everyone seems to think it is, then I do wonder why they don’t just become referees?

  • Tierst@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Best league in the world btw 😂 Countries buying teams and blatantly cheating their way to titles, PGMOL being a literal mafia…what a joke of a league

  • AlloyedRhodochrosite@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I work as a teacher. Gaining the respect and regulating the behaviour of rowdy students is something I have to do all the time. I wonder how I would fare if I approached rowdy students like the referees approach managers this year. You have a legitimate complaint? Straight to the principal, my friend. You are angry because someone wronged you? Well, fuck you I’ll call your mom.

    Don’t think this approach where they dole out consequences for every petty interaction is helping their case. Especially since it’s impossible for them to be consistent.

    • SirNukeSquad@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      You studied pedagogy and work with children in a relatively private setting.

      Referees manage overpaid adult cunts who spend 90 minutes deceiving and tricking the ref into wrong decisions in front of millions of viewers.

      This analogy doesn’t work and it will never work.

      • severedfragile@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Because children don’t try to deceive or manipulate their teachers? There’s no perfect analogy, but the point is about the authority figure needing some level of accountability and rapport with the people they preside over, and how these measures represent the opposite of that.

  • rob3rtisgod@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I get why they want to do this, but you can’t say some criticism isn’t deserved. Reffing has never been this bad or biased.

    Literally different calls every day, constantly changing rules every week and let’s not forget, literally for no fucking reason removing a goal scored. Refs aren’t even doing the MINIMUM now, they pick and choose which rules. We saw it again in Liverpool and Toulouse. The ref stopped the game and went back when they realised they messed up, yet they couldn’t do this for Liverpool spurs?

  • Bigpapa42_2006@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is the solution! Consistency, accountability, better communication, more angles, better use of technology, removing conflicts of interest… No. YOU AREN’T ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT ANYMORE. See, problem solved.

  • ThereWillBeGoals@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I will say this about the FA. I take a lot more stock in what they have to say about referee abuse than I do the PGMOL. They need to consider the standard of refereeing at every level of the game and there is a huge problem with attracting referees to the sport. The PGMOL are just soft twats.

  • Ainsley-Sorsby@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I can’t decide if their doubling down on shutting down criticism is more embarassing than the fact that they keep feeding all this embarassing exclusives to the Daily Mail

  • LockIllustrious4789@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    If they announced this along with at least some guidelines of what they would plan to do to improve the refereeing then I would be fine with this.

    But just using some managers interviews to crack down on them and clubs for daring to question the refs further screams of protecting the ‘boys club’. That’s what is most frustrating about this.

    I would argue that the abuse will actually increase, because clubs and players will feel that referees don’t want to be transparent. This encourages them and fans to think that refs are out to get their respective clubs. Everyone loses at that point.