• clyne@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Honestly, I would argue that git submodule should count as a package manager. I simply list out the repos I want to pull in and update them as needed.

    I can see the usability of this depending on the application though. My work is primarily in embedded; I only ever need to pull in a handful of small libraries.

    • lysdexic@programming.devOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honestly, I would argue that git submodule should count as a package manager. I simply list out the repos I want to pull in and update them as needed.

      I see your point, but I think that when developers refer to package managers, implicitly that means accessing standalone precompiled binaries that are ready to just be integrated into a project.

      With git submodules, unless they are used to track standalone projects or even precompiled binaries, you still have to resolve their dependencies, which is the responsibility of a package manager and the main reason they are used.

  • lysdexic@programming.devOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think that this article is missing the most obvious and perhaps most used package manager for C and C++ projects: Linux distro’s package repositories.

    It should be stressed that package managers are a requirement for Windows and, to a far lesser degree, macOS. On any Linux distro, you’d just apt install <dependency>-dev and you’d be mostly set. It’s mainly Windows development that draws this need to install packages to be able to develop anything.