

Swatches were all the rage…back in the 80’s.


Swatches were all the rage…back in the 80’s.


Well, clearly the entire Cuban government are all narco-terrorists. (wink-wink) /s
But seriously, this is so fucking illegal. If the US thinks a crime has been committed, then they should present their evidence to the ICC, and wait for an actual arrest warrant to be issued.
If their case has any merit, then they will have a legitimate reason to “arrest” Castro. But, if it doesn’t…then they need to stay the fuck out of Cuba. And if they don’t, then the ICC needs to issue an arrest warrant for not only Trump, but also Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio as well.


Before I read the article, I would suspect it’s because if they had the chance, they would fire him.


Man, this guy needs to just come out of the closet already. If he just admits it, then they can’t use it as blackmail against him anymore.

Yet another 1st amendment violation.


It’s possible. But, in that case they would have to all ignore the Charter, from bottom to top.
Even the US legal system isn’t that fucked up yet. There are still plenty of federal judges down there that still rule in favor of the Constitution.


Do we even have a description of what Helen of Troy was supposed to look like, other than “really hot”?
Because I don’t know if you’ve seen Lupita Nyong’o…but, she definitely fits that particular description.


Lol! Imagine if Genghis Khan had Alexander the Great’s publicist.


Oh, no. Anyway…


You might find this interesting, then. If you scroll down, there is a whole transcript of legislators debating the pros and cons of this legislation. You can get a feel for who is in favor of implementing these kinds of laws and who isn’t. It’s really fascinating stuff.
As I said though, at the end of the day, it is highly unlikely that this will ever pass.


Before anyone starts to panic…this will never pass. They can keep trying until the cows come home, and reintroduce this type of legislation in every possible variation…and it will still never pass.
Canada follows a legal review process for all proposed legislation. If the legislation violates any condition in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, then the legislation must be revised, or it will simply be struck down the 1st time it goes in front of a judge.
This is why they keep “trying” with these kinds of laws. Because there really is no way to directly apply them, without violating your Charter Rights. So, they keep revising the legislation before running it through the process again, to see if the latest changes pass the review stage. And they never do. They will have to change the Charter itself, before any law like this becomes properly enforceable.


I can’t believe this fucking moron calls himself a “businessman” with a straight face, and then turns around and says stupid shit like this…also with a straight face.


Creates humanitarian crisis…
…then offers aid.


Never actually said whether things are more expensive now…only that most people think they are.
Good job, folks! Another stellar piece of journalism. This is why Americans are perpetually uninformed.


So…what does NATO have to do with this?


I believe David Icke predicted this way back in the late 80’s, early 90’s. Who would have thought that fruitcake would be right about something?


Only the most qualified people!
Lol! This is Trump we’re talking about. Give it a minute.


Intent is 9/10ths of the law. This fucker needs to be prosecuted. Hard.
That’s fine. Get rid of the shit before it goes bad. Then don’t buy any more. Ever.