I’ve been accused of providing ai generated information then I’ve provided a wiki source and gotten more downvotes. I feel like the only possible way someone could be convinced that a fact is an ai hallucination is to have read the fact I provided, googled said fact, seen the fact in the ai summary and then decided “it’s in the summary it must be false.” That’s such a hypocritical thing to do after accusing someone of being wrong and using ai in my opinion.
There was this one magical time where posting a source got this one user to change their mind and I don’t know if I should be happy that it worked one time or sad that it’s only worked one time. Also still got downvoted, only after the person I replied to admitted they were wrong did people start coming around but the ratio was still fucked. Something like 50 votes of them saying I was wrong to my like 5 providing a source.
Truly ascendent move to invite the president of Israel to Australia after years of Palestine protests. The cynic in me says he was deliberately invited so that police would have sufficient excuse to step up anti protest measures in the ensuing backlash.