You just don’t get it, do you? You don’t. And I don’t know why I tried to explain it to you three times already, but safe isn’t it for hydrogen.
Safe and one of the most flammable substances on the planet (hydrogen) are opposite.
And guess what’s actually safer? Battery electric vehicles. (Not hybrids, they burn more often than regular fossil fuel vehicles.)
Hydrogen vehicle sales are falling. Good.
That’s a lie that you didn’t even google to check.
Second news story, fifth news story, sixth saying hyundai and toyota paused hydrogen production after another vehicle explosion, hydrogen fueling station explosion.
Yeah, there are plenty of articles from hydrogen fan sites claiming there are no accidents and no risk of explosions, but it’s a LIE from the hydrogen/fossil fuel industry that you swallowed whole, sorry.
And the hydrogen vehicles are still really pretty new and not worn out. If you have a hydrogen car, don’t leave it in your garage. But don’t leave it out in the sun either. Leave it in a lock up away from your property and your children, and sell it before it’s old. If you can find an idiot prepared to buy a hydrogen car that’s getting old, that is.
You failed the thinking test I set. If you can’t explain why it’s meaningless to claim that fewer people have leg injuries whilst skydiving than whilst biking, you have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what these statistics mean and your claims are stupid.
Thousands of people die from gasoline fires every year. It is objectively the more dangerous technology.
This is a really stupid misuse of statistics. Again. Stupid. Straight after I pointed that out to you.
You STILL didn’t read or understand my post.
It’s MEANINGLESS to claim that more people get injured crossing the road than going rock climbing. Think about why. If you can explain that to me then you might be worth debating.
Count me out. No way am I traveling in one of them. It’ll get worse as they get older. Embrittling takes time.
It is effectively proven that hydrogen is safer than gasoline
It’s like you never read my post. Holy poor use of statistics, Batman!
Having watched the last video, now I see why he was able to run rings around the (rather ill informed) Sky reporter - he’s a comic and author who has worked for Armando Iannucci, BBC News and does the end of year clip shows for the topical comedy panel show Have I Got News for You. He’s intelligent, quick witted and knows UK politics alright.
Actually spoonerisms were named after Rev Spooner, who was a real person who did this a lot: “The Lord is a shoving leapard” etc.
You are much more likely to die from gasoline or electrical fires.
This is like pointing out that you are much more likely to burn yourself cooking than arc welding. It’s true, but it tells you absolutely nothing about how safe arc welding is. Nothing at all.
The vast majority of hydrogen is used in oil refineries and most of the rest is used in the chemical industry, with plenty of safety manuals and safety processes, and members of the public aren’t allowed anywhere near the operating controls, exactly because it’s extremely volatile.
Almost zero hydrogen is used in domestic or public settings. There’s a reason for that.
Again, NASA wrote over 1000 pages on how to deal with hydrogen safely.
Also, the vast majority of hydrogen is produced from hydrocarbons. It’s carbon free at the point of use, like electricity is, but unlike electricity there’s next to no sustainable production. Battery safety and capacity are coming on in leaps and bounds. (China is developing newer batteries using less rare elements but with greater capacity and much greater charging speed.)
Hydrogen will always and forever be extremely dangerous.
It’s definitely FINE.
Permanently.
I’m sure.
Very safe.
It’s especially fine if there is no ceiling or roof under which any leaking hydrogen can collect, and no steel pipes or other materials that hydrogen can react with and embrittle.
Feel free to go on the hydrogen vehicles as much as you like.
I shan’t, but that’s just me and physics and history.
You do you.
Don’t worry about any sort of increasing rate of hydrogen explosions since the Hindenburg disaster.
I won’t.
I’m sure NASA wrote literally over 1000 pages about safety in hydrogen systems for shits and giggles. It’s surely safe for public transport, much safer with all that oxygen and heat around instead of in the cold vacuum of space.
It made me much happier today than it did yesterday. Yesterday it was being a complete pain in the neck, but today, all good.
Believe it or not, petrol and diesel have a high ignition point but crucially require plenty of oxygen to ignite and plenty of fuel to keep burning, and a small flaw in the airtightness of a vehicle or engine won’t cause a disaster.
Not so hydrogen. Hydrogen is a tiny tiny molecule compared with hydrocarbons, and oxygen is very small compared with hydrocarbons. A tiny flaw in a hydrogen vehicle or engine can allow oxygen to spread quickly in the gas, and hydrogen burns freely, rapidly and readily at even tiny doses of oxygen or tiny doses of hydrogen.
Brand new vehicles and pipes are lovely and undamaged and airtight. But vehicles bump around, and time takes its toll. Massive boom, but later.
The bleachiness is in the nose, and it’s flourine, which smells very like, but distinct to chlorine, which is in most bleaches.
You detect saltiness with your tongue, not your nose.
This is about 75mph and not terribly impressive for a train.
There’s a reason we used to have lighter than air mass travel but we don’t now, and that reason is the extreme destructive power of hydrogen.
You are erroneously assuming that most US cops went into the police force to uphold the law and keep citizens safe, rather than to be allowed to boss black guys around and shoot them without repercussions.
Or her partner needs to see a doctor about his penis.
it’s totally understandable that if you have no idea how to approach solving 2+2, then a machine that automatically tells you 2+2=4.217 would seem really useful
So much this. LLMs are wrong around 60% of the time when I know the answer or can check it. Why on earth would I trust it when I don’t know?
I think people who trust LLMs trust them because they don’t know any better.
Either there are some circumstances when you want it to be a human or there aren’t.
If you don’t care whether it’s human or computer that makes the art, why not get an LLM girlfriend or boyfriend and a fleshlight or dildo? That way you can have the companionship, the flirting and the sex, and you can get the LLM to be the ideal partner.
I’ve found the Starship’s Mage series by Glynn Stewart very entertaining.
Premise: interstellar flight requires you to have at least one mage on board who uses their magic to move the star ship by a light year but then needs to sleep off magical exhaustion for several hours.
How and why mages developed and where they fit in society is revealed later.
You so fucking fail to grasp the concept of relative frequency it’s astonishing. Fourth or fifth time you’ve made the same basic adult numeracy level comprehension error.
And no, you lied again, there are less than 100 fatalities globally ever from battery cars, and they’re nearly all Teslas. Elon Musk was never a fan of safety checks.
Hybrids, like I said, are the most dangerous of the non-hydrogen vehicles and cause over twice as many fires as petrol or diesel vehicles, but those are about sixty times as likely proportionately to cause a fire than far-and-away safest vehicles: battery electric vehicles.