Hypothetically, supposing I proved my innocence, would you unban me?

As I previously said (but which will probably be ignored, because of how easy it is to lie about something that’s literally in front of people), admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance. You say all that like I make it a secret who my secondary names are (which your own proofs prove isn’t the case).

If that’s what you’re saying, more is going on behind the scenes than you think. I’m still a proud community contributor if that’s what you’re getting at.

Not what I said. I am saying it should be up to businesses if they want to yield to that. It strikes me as entitled to say granting the money during their leave is the only acceptable way of going about it. But excuse me for seeing that someone asked what I think of paternity leave and not answering how they might’ve wanted.

I would say that, ideally, it should be up to the businesses if they want to uphold that, though that stance should be specified at the beginning.

Turquoise.

Same. I can barely even dream, something most aphantasiacs can at least do regularly.

Anything athletic; unusual in the fact I’m healthy/slim/etc. Name a single sport or exercise and I wouldn’t even have the basics down. Except for any aquatic activities which I just never got the hang of (can’t even swim), when taking physical tests at school which were often timed, I’d do what my teacher would call trolling the grading system by starting out laggy/slow, followed by performing a nanosecond better each time to fulfill expectations.

Party City, because I have no reason to.

Vermont time.

Pokémon Colosseum and Majora’s Mask.

More accurately put, what Davel means is he thinks you’re some kind of double of me (which makes me wonder if he sees the irony of pinging someone who has been accused, by both others and yourself, of being the equivalent of that of the person I was responding to) and thinks you interacting with me is akin to someone puppeteering with themselves (which makes me cast doubt on either his intent or powers as most admins in most places can numerically see someone’s identification, and his undertones contrast with other admins’) and that this is why he thinks you’re lenient towards me.

Quince cider.

You say that like I make the connection between me and the KaneLivesInDeath name a secret. Admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance.

Same.

People who see my own stuff can also see I’m not any other ThatWasLeftHanded. Because who knew people would take name usage this personally, especially when the point wasn’t impersonation in the first place?

Anyone can put up a sign. And the authorities will thankfully be there to enforce against it. What you share defy the very fundamentals of Germany right now, a Germany as away from Nazism as every nation is from their own imperial eras (and nobody talks about those reviving).

Simply sharing a name does not equal impersonation. If I like a name, I use it, I act within the rules of wherever I am to the best of my ability, and I don’t claim to be anyone else (which also requires intent). Going by your logic, everyone on the mod team is impersonating someone. But I know better than to think in those terms. I am not violating any rules, norms, or ethics in sharing a name. And I would say the same about the person Davel accuses me of impersonating even though I predate her. She’s not impersonating me, but she would be by his and your logic. None of what I’m saying is gaslighting or guilt tripping, it’s just common sense.

Well just look at what I said there. I’m no expert on German law, but I explain right then and there why I was saying the AfD wouldn’t be Nazis, at least to the Germans who still have cultural PTSD over it.

Imagine if we had Germans in our midst. There’d be like a 30% chance right now they’d be a part of the AfD. What are we going to do, ban 30% of Germans from interacting with us?