• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because rich people now know that if they midhandle a fire arm and kill a person, nothing will happen. They can blame some poorly paid wagie, they don’t have to accept any consequences for bad gross negligence

      • realcaseyrollins
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean he shot that woman and killed her as far as I know, are there more details I’m not aware of?

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There are, yes. Unfortunately no one has written any articles about it, and multiple people haven’t gone to court over the situation either. It’s really too bad, it’s just a big black hole of information. The only thing all of us can do is simply read a headline and make emotional guesses as to what happened.

        • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ah. Ok. I mean, I’m of the opinion that he has every reason to believe he wasn’t going to shoot her when he pulled the trigger.

          But I just wasn’t sure if you were misunderstanding the headline or if you were in the camp of punish everybody all the time.

            • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              1 day ago

              Personally, I just don’t think Baldwin is the one who deserves the charge. There were people on set responsible for ensuring his gun wasn’t loaded. Those people failed in their job.

              • araneae@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                Folks really wanted Baldwin’s balls over this because he was Trump on SNL. A large part of this whole case was disguised political animus.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  As she should been but that doesn’t resolve issue of alecs Liabit as the guy who didn’t murder and the guy in charge of the set.

                  These parasites love taking profit but they are never there to take any negative consequences

              • realcaseyrollins
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                But wasn’t Baldwin not even supposed to be shooting at the person he killed? If he had shot someone he was supposed to fire a blank at, I understand. Aren’t you supposed to practice gun safety even with replicas? Don’t point at anything you’re not willing to shoot?

                • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  He was following the directions of the director and everybody involved, including the woman who died, agreed to do the scene. She wasn’t just some random person on set, she was behind the camera because she was the director of photography.

                  If she didn’t feel the scene was safe to film, she had the right to say no to using a realistic prop. This is an obviously sad incident. But Manny people were found or pleaded guilty to the events. Baldwin just isn’t I’ve of them. Actors can’t be expected to be experts and have to defer to experts on set all the time.

                  • realcaseyrollins
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    24 hours ago

                    Ah I see. That makes sense then. I didn’t know she was behind the camera when she got shot.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was on a movie set where it is to be reasonably expected that the armorer will clear weapons to be safe on set and that actors aren’t expected to be firearms experts so that they are able to perform with them.

          It should also be expected that said armorers do their job as expected and NOT shoot real ammo out of prop guns. And if they do, they’re expected to properly clear them; even though they never should in the first place.

          But yeah, this was totally about Alec Baldwin the elite bourgeois flexing his real ultimate power of wealth and crushing the matter-nothing proletariat, the people have lost once again because he was not held accountable for someone else’s actions.

          I’m all for eating the rich but let’s not just make shit up, that makes us look ridiculous.

          • realcaseyrollins
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            A really cheesy way to put it but I generally agree. However I don’t think that Alec Baldwin pressured the prosecutor to back off, I think the prosecutor didn’t want the smoke from other entities like Baldwin’s managers or business partners, or Alec Baldwin’s fans