• Evil_Shrubbery
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    The majority of hereditary peers, who inherit their titles through their families, were abolished in 1999 under the last Labour government and this bill gets rid of the last remaining 92.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Id love to know what made the 92 special or the 15 mentioned in another comment. Where they like close family lines to the royal family or something?

      • Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        IIRC the 92 that were sitting were elected by all the heredetary peers who were eligable to sit in the Lords when the change came into effect. Ironicly making them the only elected members in the Lords.

        I imagine something similar will happen here with the hereditaries that actually make useful contributions being turned into life peers.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          wait. the house of lords is still unelected? I thought it had mostly become elected with some inherited left or such. You know never mind. I think imma go wikipedia this.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Edit: I remembered the appointment process a bit wrong, see ohulancutash’s reply

            For the most part it is appointed. Each prime minister traditionally gives some people peerages at the end of their term, which entitles but does not require those people to sit in the House of Lords. On paper it’s the king that does it, but in practice it’s the PM. There are a few others like the last hereditary lords that this is about (they used to make up most of the House) and the lords spiritual (a couple dozen bishops from the church of England, who I would rather like to see get the same treatment as the hereditary peers)

            • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Peerages are handed out annually on the advice of the PM, and there is a quota system to allow each party to be represented in the intake. The end of term appointments are personal to the PM, and are not part of the same system.

              • Skua@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Ahh, there’s the danger of working off of memory without checking. That said, upon checking, it must be more than annually? If we take Blair as an example since he had a long tenure, it seems like he did a big chunk in June most (but not all) years but there are almost always at least a couple of other batches or individual appointments