• Hell_nah_brother
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    if you are held legally liable that means your not allowed to do the thing. how is that not a ban?

    Re-read the sentence but slowly. Yes, you are held legally accountable if you create divisions among or undermine the 56 different officially recognised ethnicities.

    The same way the US or Russia or Israel (and their agency and organisations) should be held responsible for instigating divisions in other countries. That’s really it.

    It’s “”banning”” foreign interference in the social and ethnic fabric of the country. Oh no!! Can you imagine the US without Israeli interference? People would be forced to think by themselves!!

    You can spin it and call it what you want, but you can’t change reality. Unfortunately for you this is not what the law we are discussing says.

    And if you are thinking: “holdup, this is challenging my worldview too much! Is it possible that I’m wrong? No CNN must be right!” I have a lot of bridges to sell to you man.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s banning schools in Tibetan, in Tibet.

      Can you imagine Quebec without Quebecois? And threatening prison for anyone, anywhere, saying that’s deliberate cultural erasure?