TL;DR: I built a chat app for people who use AI for actual work and get annoyed when long conversations turn into a mess.
It lets you:
- branch off a confusing part of an AI answer and discuss it separately
- bring the useful result back into the main conversation
- compress a long messy conversation into a clean summary and continue from there
I’m looking for people to try it and tell me what sucks.
Try it: https://fukurama.com/
2-minute walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwNK6OIlkGY
You’ll need an API key from one of the supported providers.
I built Fukurama because whenever I use ChatGPT/Claude/etc. for anything complicated, the conversation eventually becomes a mess.
Example:
I ask the AI to help me solve something.
It gives me an answer, but one part needs clarification.
So I ask about that.
Then that answer raises another question.
Then I correct an assumption.
Then I explain some extra context.
Twenty messages later, the thing I originally cared about is buried somewhere in the middle of the conversation.
Fukurama is my attempt to fix that.
Side discussions
Highlight any part of an AI response and click Ask.
That opens a separate discussion about only that part.
When you’re done, you can:
- throw the side discussion away
- keep it attached
- or use what you learned to update the original AI response
So the main conversation doesn’t have to become polluted with every clarification and tangent.
Consolidation
When a conversation gets too long, Fukurama can turn it into a clean document containing the important information.
Then you continue from that instead of dragging the entire conversation behind you forever.
Other stuff
There are a few smaller workflow features too.
For example, instead of editing your own old message and regenerating everything, you can directly tell the AI how you want its response changed.
Supported providers currently include:
OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Kimi, Mistral, and Qwen.
I shipped this very recently, so I’m specifically looking for feedback on:
- anything confusing
- anything annoying
- places where the workflow feels slow or unnecessary
- token usage
- bugs
You do not need to be polite. If something is stupid, tell me it’s stupid.


That’s not the same thing.
Claude in VS Code is an agent/coding harness. “Plan” mode helps the agent plan how to perform a task before it edits code.
Fukurama is a general-purpose chat frontend. The problem I’m solving is what happens during a long conversation: you branch into clarifications/tangents, useful information gets scattered across many messages, and the main thread becomes hard to work with.
For example, if I’m using AI to plan a trip, understand a legal concept, write something, research a topic, or just think through a complicated question, “Claude Code plan mode” is not an alternative to that workflow.
The overlap is basically just that both involve AI and the word “plan.” The interaction model and the problem being solved are different.
upd: updated for clarity