return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 年前Democrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square121linkfedilinkarrow-up1979arrow-down120
arrow-up1959arrow-down1external-linkDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square121linkfedilink
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·1 年前 Red states hate billionaires even more than blue states (citation needed)
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.socialcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·1 年前They often just call them elitists, bankers, or “Jews”.
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.socialcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 年前“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前No, it wasn’t. I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.
minus-squareI'll be on [email protected]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前That only proves that they hate Jews more than blue states. Republicans equating “elite bankers” with Jews, and then you equating that to billionaires, doesn’t actually make them the same thing you know…
(citation needed)
They often just call them elitists, bankers, or “Jews”.
That’s not supporting evidence.
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
No, it wasn’t.
I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.
That only proves that they hate Jews more than blue states.
Republicans equating “elite bankers” with Jews, and then you equating that to billionaires, doesn’t actually make them the same thing you know…