Bluesky, a decentralized Twitter-like social network, is pausing new signups “temporarily” to try and resolve performance issues it’s been experiencing after Twitter introduced limits on the amount of tweets you can see in a day. Even though you still need an invite code to be able to join Bluesky, it seems that the influx of new users has been a problem.

    • yesdogishere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      bluesky is crap. it requires an invite and id verification. 100% will turn into a fascist navel-gazing network.

      • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        bluesky is crap. it requires an invite and id verification. 100% will turn into a fascist navel-gazing network.

        The rest of the platforms which will still be using anonymous access will be invaded by AI’s astroturfing their stuff into your face. Which one do you prefer?

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s literally impossible for any social network to ever under any circumstances be relevant/important enough that asking for an ID could theoretically be forgivable under any circumstances, let alone valid.

          There are very few scenarios where any website asking for an ID should even be legal. It’s a massive and inexcusable privacy issue.

    • AshDene@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it claims it will become decentralized (unless something has changed in the last month or so).

      • Machinist3359@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe they opened things up to developers recently. I do think they will become decentralized, but am more concerned it will become a “no censorship” aka “no moderation” mess pretty quickly. It relies quite heavily on filters and aggregators rather than moderators.