Oldie but goodie.
Transcript: Tweet by the SRSLY wrong podcast. Content: “message to my enemies: when the revolution comes you’re not just gonna get the wall, buddy, you’re gonna get four walls, a roof, clean clothes, good food, education, and quality health care because that’s what every human being alive deserves”
Never said anything about it not being peaceful. “Getting the wall” is an executional method. There’s a difference between enacting violence and executing people.
What do you think “getting the wall” means? O.o
Obviously it means you’re getting part of a room /s
Like… nice deflection and if you don’t want to continue the argument, that’s fine, but… Is that it?
All that contrarian shit and accusing me of strawmanning and all that and it ends with an insincere, sarcastic comment?
Yeah. After thinking about it, it’s not like the USA will ever have a revolution as much as a forced civil war, if it happens, and then violence would be inevitable.
So arguing about a utopia that can’t peacefully happen is really redundant.
Still not getting your point. Not sure you used “redundant” correctly here.
You do know that there’s more that the US in the world, right?
Yes, but considering most of the world at least has some form of nationalized healthcare already, including UK, Canada, and Australia, and the commentary is in English, it really narrows the likelihood that you and most others are talking about the USA.
I know it isn’t here in Finland you’re talking about at least.
Why would you think revolution is about nationalized healthcare?
Everyone can’t get quality healthcare if you can’t afford healthcare in the first place at all.
But why would you think that quality healthcare is the goal of a (violent) revolution?