Godric@lemmy.world to okmatewanker@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 months ago'Ate Seagullslemmy.worldimagemessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down134
arrow-up1451arrow-down1image'Ate Seagullslemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to okmatewanker@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square101fedilink
minus-squarekattenluik@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32arrow-down8·edit-22 months agoAs if you wouldn’t steal a £30 pound steak if it had zero consequences and no morals attached, besides that I don’t think anything deserves to be abused before getting killed and especially not in public with children watching.
minus-squareDudeDudenson@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·2 months agoSo you’re saying he should had been more effective in killing the seagull in front of the kids
minus-squarekattenluik@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·2 months agoHe just shouldn’t have done it, but obviously yes that too.
minus-squareWooki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoObviously a waste of good avian meat
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·2 months ago if it had zero consequences And yet, here there were consequences. It’s just a specific breeding programme and he was culling the failures. #evolution \s
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoExactly, he’s helping nature
minus-squarelittle_tuptup@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoI don’t see where it says he abused the bird before killing it.
minus-squareVilian@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoexactly, the swing probably was to get enough speed
minus-squareSoulg@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoPretty sure it dying instantly in a quick whack is the opposite of being abused Like no he shouldn’t have done that but you’re going a little overboard
As if you wouldn’t steal a £30 pound steak if it had zero consequences and no morals attached, besides that I don’t think anything deserves to be abused before getting killed and especially not in public with children watching.
So you’re saying he should had been more effective in killing the seagull in front of the kids
He just shouldn’t have done it, but obviously yes that too.
Obviously a waste of good avian meat
And yet, here there were consequences.
It’s just a specific breeding programme and he was culling the failures. #evolution \s
Exactly, he’s helping nature
I don’t see where it says he abused the bird before killing it.
exactly, the swing probably was to get enough speed
Pretty sure it dying instantly in a quick whack is the opposite of being abused
Like no he shouldn’t have done that but you’re going a little overboard