• amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The article is interesting. I’m not sure I fully understand the argument in it, or maybe am feeling it’s incomplete. I sort of get the idea of capitalism to some extent being a self-reinforcing mechanism, but there is also the conscious class and caste development alongside it done by humans. And without the monopoly on violence that the capitalist state has - or if we are going bigger, the “political power coming from the barrel of a gun” that the capitalist empire has - the exploitative nature of it has little to stand on; the exploited masses would be able to say no without life-threatening consequence.

    • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, it is true that capital cannot be understood as a self sustaining force. It can only exist in a certain environment that has been prepared for it. In this way, the real nature of this “God” is laid bare, as another strange kind of lifeform, that feeds upon humanity. As long as the correct environment is provided, capital continues to reproduce and evolve and its total mass continues to increase. That is until it reaches the limit of how much energy it can extract from the finite human population (tendency of rate of profit to fall).