TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1413arrow-down124
arrow-up1389arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareel_abuelo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 month agoHuh? I’ve worked with TypeScript + React for the last 5yrs and the only time I see OOP is when someone’s done something wrong. Maybe you’re thinking of old react with class based components?
minus-squaretoastal@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoProving that adding the class keyword to the ECMAScript spec was a mistake that leads folks down a path they should not travel 🙃
minus-squareel_abuelo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI completely agree. I taught JS/TS for 5yrs and I always emphasised that the ‘class’ keyword was just syntactic sugar for what was already available in prototype inheritance of JS.
Huh? I’ve worked with TypeScript + React for the last 5yrs and the only time I see OOP is when someone’s done something wrong.
Maybe you’re thinking of old react with class based components?
Proving that adding the
classkeyword to the ECMAScript spec was a mistake that leads folks down a path they should not travel 🙃I completely agree. I taught JS/TS for 5yrs and I always emphasised that the ‘class’ keyword was just syntactic sugar for what was already available in prototype inheritance of JS.