• bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 days ago

    But of course! Real hardware or bust.

    This particular machine has been my daily driver for months now, so I would say it is faring quite well.

      • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        On this machine I have everything except for Bluetooth and the fingerprint reader, neither of which I ever use anyway.

        • aida@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 days ago

          something you can’t do or any inconvenience on this system?

          • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Oh sure, lots of things are “inconvenient” on Plan 9.

            Of note for most would-be users: if you rely on a modern web browser like Firefox/Chrome, forget about it. Never going to happen.

            It’s important to remember that Plan 9 is fundamentally a research operating system; it’s not really a “typical” environment by any stretch, and that stems largely from it being entirely network-based and distributed. A single Plan 9 system in isolation can only be so interesting. Using it on a laptop like this can be an entirely different set of problems.

            If you’d like some examples of things you may face:

            • booting can be slow

            • can be intimidating to set up for some of the more important features – factotum(4) and secstore(1), new users and directories under /, etc.

            • cwfs is slow

            • hjfs is really slow

            • no multi-monitor support

            • only recently did we get a filesystem that specifically aims to be crash-safe

            • poor documentation, though it’s been getting better

            • reading research papers is basically a requirement for understanding the system

            • security is not a priority

            For me, though? I genuinely don’t need much more than what’s available in the base system.