Steven Pinker explains the cognitive biases we all suffer from and how they can short-circuit rational thinking and lead us into believing stupid things. Skip to 12:15 to bypass the preamble.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Far more often, it’s just added in post from a sound effect library or foley artist. It may not even be a noise that animal ever makes.

    I didn’t claim it was only cleaning the audio. It was my intention that an artificial substitution can the best thing to do for education.

    Your original post didn’t mention that the wrong sounds are used. That’s completely different.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      My post did mention other things that you decided not to bring up- namely the bias of the production team and the tone of the narrator.

      I mentioned those first specifically because they were the most important.

      I could point out that music also creates an artificial mood which might not reflect the reality of what was shot.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        bias of the production team and the tone of the narrator.

        Which I already addressed by claiming professors have bias even in hard sciences.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Professors have academic expertise in their subject and try to bring it to bear in their papers.

          Producers want the best reaction to get viewers so that the documentary makes money.

          They have slightly different goals.

          I’m amazed you aren’t aware of the fact that the primary purpose of most documentaries is to make money, either directly in theaters or indirectly by bringing viewers in the TV channel or streaming service.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s a fair point. However I don’t think that a profit motive automatically excludes education.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Automatically? No. But that’s, as I said, why you can’t trust a documentary. How will you know that you’re getting an actual education.

              If you don’t think that’s a problem, you should check out how many people got fooled into thinking What the Bleep Do We Know was an actual documentary about quantum physics. They even interviewed some physicists (without letting them know who they were) and cut their interviews to make it look like they were supporting the documentary’s ideas.

              And then it got into theaters nationwide and made a bunch of money and many people to this day believe the nonsense in that film.

              Why wouldn’t they believe it? It sounded true, it was being presented authoritatively.