Personally for me, I’ve always been a fan of bspwm

I’ve been using hyprland as of recent to try it out. But I think I’ll be trying something else soon. But I do want to stick with wayland.

  • Biscoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m too lazy to do more configuration than I have to so I go with KDE. Using X but I believe it has Wayland too

  • AtomicPile@tron.atomicpile.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kde plasma. I’ve tried everything else and used to change to tiles managers and whatnot. Ended up just sticking with kde because it’s familiar.

    • misaloun@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did not like the concept of dwm. Is it good in practice? Changing code and recompiling? I suppose it goes with the spirit of gentoo.

      • Gentoo1337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends on what you need your WM to do, really. In practice, usually you just patch everything you need one day and then forget about it. There is a website with sorted patch list with description and everything, if you’re interested. Sometimes I can even modify the source code and add or remove stuff, since the code is small and it compiles in seconds. But it’s a dynamic tiling window manager and no patch will change that, if that’s not what you like that’s totally fair. Also, updating might be painful.

        If bspwm does what you need it to do, and you don’t feel like you want to add or remove something from it, just stick with it.