• chaogomu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The start of the Syrian civil war had nothing to do with anyone except the Syrian people being pissed off at living under the most restrictive police state in the Arab world. There were protests after a mass arrest and subsequent torture of 15 teenage boys who had spay-painted some anti-government graffiti on some walls around the city.

    Assad cracked down on the protests hard, which led to people saying, “fuck this shit, time for a revolution”.

    Iran started helping Assad, and then the US started helping the rebels. And yeah it’s a shit show now. But no, it would have kicked off without outside help.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      A lot of people would still have died without outside intervention and syrian had the right to kick of the revolution against asad. I don’t disagree with that but outaide intervation definitely made it a lot worse. Ben ali wasalso very brutal but due to the lack of interests from major powers the revolution in tunisia was relatively very peaceful

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Again, the context is important. Mostly that the Tunisian military refused to step in and support Wasalo, eventually forcing him to flee.

        Asad on the other hand, is still very popular with his own ethnic group, and draws heavily from them to staff his military. Iran’s help just made things worse.