• Arkaelus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The world as it is now, yes. But this is far from the only option, thus the world is not an inevitable soup of suffering. So, no.

      • Katrisia@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Unless you’re both an antinatalist and a philosophical pessimist and believe that the world will always be that soup. But yeah, that’s not the case for all antinatalists. A friend of mine calls himself a “temporary antinatalist”.

        • Arkaelus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          True. I guess the distinction, though semantically redundant, seems to be contextually necessary nowadays…