• QHC@kbin.social
    3·
    11 months ago

    I see where you are coming from and I agree that due to the ease of modern communications “accountability” can easily be weaponized.

    I am not sure how this relates at all to the “justice system”, however. Are private organizations only allowed to part ways with an employee because they committed crimes? This is not really about “guilt” that can be proven or disproven in a court case, and there are already mechanisms in place for people to be compensated if they can show that they were unfairly treated or if contracts were violated.

    • Metaright@kbin.social
      2·
      11 months ago

      I am not sure how this relates at all to the “justice system”, however. Are private organizations only allowed to part ways with an employee because they committed crimes? This is not really about “guilt” that can be proven or disproven in a court case, and there are already mechanisms in place for people to be compensated if they can show that they were unfairly treated or if contracts were violated.

      It wasn’t a fully formed proposal, honestly. You make a very good point.

    • realcaseyrollins@narwhal.cityOP
      1·
      11 months ago

      Are private organizations only allowed to part ways with an employee because they committed crimes?

      I frankly think that you probably shouldn’t be fired for mere suspicion of a crime; there has to at least be a fair bit of demonstrable evidence. For example there is a fair bit of demonstrable evidence that Roiland flirted with underage fans.