IN-DEPTH: Top Law Schools Promote Ditching the Constitution

The nation’s elite law schools teach future lawyers and judges that America’s Constitution is broken and should be scrapped…

  • odium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What if 90% of people hated both parties. But half of them hate part A more than party B and the other half hate B more than A. They’ll have to choose what they consider to be the lesser of two evils. Instead of voting for a candidate who represents their view, as was intended by the democratic system, they instead vote for the candidate who is least against their views out of two options.

    With ranked choice voting they can vote for whoever best represents their views. If there aren’t enough people voting for that person, then your vote would go to the next closest person to your views. And so forth and so on. In the end, imo the resulting candidate would have the closest views to the most people.

    It would break up the factionalism that George Washington warned against.

    • Masterofballs@exploding-heads.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      With ranked choice voting they can vote for whoever best represents their views. If there aren’t enough people voting for that person, then your vote would go to the next closest person to your views. And so forth and so on. In the end, imo the resulting candidate would have the closest views to the most people.

      So how would you vote for the people to be voted for in the first place?

      What you are gonna get is a bunch of puppet candidates specifically placed to dilute another candidates votes. You just complicate actually obfuscate the vote. So that the layman gets tricked into giving his vote to a turdbag. We already have a system where your vote can go to the next vote. It’s called the primaries. And most people don’t vote there.

      Instead encourage primary voting.