• Mad__vegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I liked him too until I found out it would prompt a special election that Democrats could likely lose

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        He’s a sitting senator of a red leaning state who won because of who he is. He has to vacate to run for VP, which is bad for keeping that seat. Losing the senate easily hamstrings any efforts a President Harris would bring, especially with GOP being the way they are.

        Granted, that can be a problem for all swing state guys. Just isn’t as terrible for governors (although that can screw with other things, like voting rights in a given state).

        • spamfajitas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          54
          ·
          3 months ago

          Senator Kelly’s replacement would be required by Arizona law to be a Democrat appointed by the Governor (also currently a Democrat). The special election to replace the replacement wouldn’t be until 2026. If he’s the right one for the job, it might be worth potentially taking a hit 2 years into a Harris administration.

          • taiyang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s a good point. I didn’t know it wasn’t until 2026. The main point is to sure up Arizona, which is understandable. The guy from Pennsylvania might be good for that reason, too, but that’s a little less iffy as it’s a little more blue, especially since it sounds like Philly is loving the Harris hype.