• sarjalim@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, it’s impossible that they didn’t at least entertain the idea that she was guilty with so many incidents and so many people speaking out. And the execs immediate response to that is to silence the whistleblowers, to maintain the reputation of the hospital. Absolutely repulsive.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has to be Criminal negligence at the very least.

      The reviews they themselves commissioned (when they should have gone to the police) said at least 4 deaths should be forensically investigated and they ignored it.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well in capitalist society daddy business man can do no wrong.

      But yeah they should be held criminally respossible and there are laws to prosecute this under, it just won’t happen.

      • sol@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the publicly owned and funded NHS, not a business.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          The people running this “public” enteprise appear to be acting just vanilla business men 101 tho

          • Diasl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Having seen the top end of an NHS trust some of it is similar to leadership at a big business in terms of attitudes. They care much more about reputational damage than dealing with problems sometimes.