archive_bot@lemmygrad.mlB to GenZhouArchive@lemmygrad.ml · 3 years ago

Marx claimed capitalism was crucial for production: China skipped their capitalism phase, so that's why they re-introduced it with Dengist reforms. Is this statement too reductive?

1

0

Marx claimed capitalism was crucial for production: China skipped their capitalism phase, so that's why they re-introduced it with Dengist reforms. Is this statement too reductive?

archive_bot@lemmygrad.mlB to GenZhouArchive@lemmygrad.ml · 3 years ago

1

u/jmattchew - originally from r/GenZhou
Question is in the title. I know that everything is more complicated than this, but is it a fair shorthand assessment or not? Could it be too simple to say that feudalism -> capitalism -> socialism, or is this actually the right way to look at it? Did the USSR fail because it went straight from feudalism to socialism and then introduced the wrong reforms?

Chat

archive_bot@lemmygrad.mlOPB
link
fedilink
arrow-up
1·
3 years ago
u/orkgashmo - originally from r/GenZhou
They didn’t re-introduced capitalism, they adapted their socialism to the global market.