• BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 小时前

      I agree. He made great contributions to theory. Foundations of Leninism is great - and he’s a really good writer on top of it. Unsurprising as he was a voracious reader of Marxist theory.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 小时前

        Dialectical and Historical Materialism is a good text as well as Marxism and the National Question. Stalin’s writing style is surprisingly gentle and clear, as opposed to Marx’s literary style, Engels’ flowery style, Lenin’s angry shitposter style, or Mao’s straightforward and direct style.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 小时前

            I actually prefer Politzer’s Elementary Principles of Philosophy, it helped me greatly with comprehending dialectical and historical materialism. Dialectical and Historical Materialism is good, but Elementary Principles of Philosophy breaks the subject into easily digestible building blocks.

        • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 小时前

          Dialectical and historical materialism is, in my opinion, one of the best texts for an introduction to Marxism-leninism.

          Id read Some of the other more recommended stuff like Principles of Communism, the Manifesto, etc and had vague ideations.

          But I found that text on my own while looking into “Stalinism” and it just made everything “click”.

          Read Stalin 🗿

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 小时前

            I will always push Politzer’s Elementary Principles of Philosophy whenever Dialectical and Historical Materialism is brought up. I prefer it over Dialectical and Historical Materialism greatly, it is more in-depth and breaks the subject down into smaller bites.