• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Okay so they still have 2.5 Billion in their pocket and the net profits from three or four more years?

    Let’s say they “only” make two Billion in net profit for the next three years. They’d have eleven Billion dollars just sitting there. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • realcaseyrollinsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does that make you mad? Do you wish you had that money instead?

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is Lemmy; theres very vocal cohort of the users who are anti-corporate, poor grasp of the financial system, and have no content to read so they wander out into communities they have no business in.

        Don’t bother.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Er, sure, but - is the larger point not clear? They don’t need to fire people. They’re ludicrously profitable.

        • realcaseyrollinsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not immediately no, but it increases their margins which makes the company more likely to survive a significant economic downturn.