• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    That 10% created a demand that caused the 60% to happen. To decrease or even eliminate that 60%, the 10% have to change their behaviour as well, even after decades of being indoctrinated.

    • ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not even remotely true. Most emissions are caused by factors completely indepedent from consumer vehicles. Nearly 60 percent comes from power generation, industrial processes, and goods transportation (Not to be confused with personal vehicle use)

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Who those power generated for? What those industrial processes making? And who those goods is delivered to? It’s all come down to over consumption.

        We all need fuel to drive the car, if the oil is stopped today, what are people gonna do? They still have to change their behaviour regardless.

        Same case everywhere. Stopping plastic and consumer has to change the way they purchase thing. Stopping beef industry and consumer has to eat less beef or eat another thing. It’s a cycle, most of that 90% emission that link to big company emission is directly correlated to how the consumer act. You can’t stop oil without first giving a viable alternative transportation everywhere, but you won’t get viable alternative transportation and a properly build town/city if people being a little bitch with NIMBY mindset and want everywhere to be accessible by car and refuse to walk.