Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agosocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1730arrow-down18
arrow-up1722arrow-down1imagesocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneFiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squareTxzK@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down1·7 months agoI just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
minus-squareVoltage@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·7 months agoI used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoIt’s the same number on every Instagram profile
minus-squareOrbituary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down14·7 months agoLiterary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
minus-squareswitchboard_pete@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up64arrow-down1·7 months agoliterally is objectively correct in this context
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·7 months agoThe latter is correct, no?
minus-squaresyreus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoIn the secondary, new-age definition of “literally” yes that’s true. We lost the war for “literally”. It’s now just an emphasis word. The definition is mind bending: 1)in a literal manner or sense; exactly. 2)informal; used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true. On the bright side less people use “absolutely” incorrectly than before.
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 months agoSure, but where in the image do you see someone acknowledge the existence of Threads?
minus-squareFiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·7 months agoi haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
I just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
I used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
It’s the same number on every Instagram profile
Literary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
literally is objectively correct in this context
Literaryly
The latter is correct, no?
In the secondary, new-age definition of “literally” yes that’s true.
We lost the war for “literally”. It’s now just an emphasis word. The definition is mind bending:
1)in a literal manner or sense; exactly.
2)informal; used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true.
On the bright side less people use “absolutely” incorrectly than before.
Sure, but where in the image do you see someone acknowledge the existence of Threads?
deleted by creator
I’m reading it
i haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
… MILF Messenger?
you did 🙀