• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh well, not everything is going to work for everyone. But, at least you have a point of reference for it now, which is always worth the time spent, imo.

    What was it that made you put it down?

    • Kyle Judd@lemmy.autism.placeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The lady’s mother showing her daugther pronography in a comic book and the usual subverted take on the superhero genre.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        I mean, it was the subversion, we just talked about this!

        That said, I don’t like Citizen Kane for similar reasons. Oh, it’s a foundational work you say? That’s great that better films have been built off of it.

        Silk Spectre is supposed to be both a commentary on the Silver Age objectification of superheroines and a reference to these btw:

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tijuana_bible

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Fair enough, for surr.

        Fwiw, the Watchmen is the source of much of the subversion that we’ve gotten used to now. At the time, there had never been anything that went so deep into the essence of hero comics and dug up the reasons why they existed, then turned them upside down before destroying them.

        I always wish that people that came into comics after that era could have a chance to experience not just the Watchmen with naive eyes, but all the other stuff like vertigo, milestone, and image that really broke the idea that comics had to be geared to kids and/or only simple subjects. It really was a time where everything got torn apart and rebuilt.