• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They should’ve voted for democrats, who also love genocide. Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. This doesn’t deserve mockery, no matter how misguided.

    • finalarbiter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So the better choice was the guy endorsed by literal nazis, who are known for… checks notes their genocidal inclinations?

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The “better choice” argument is used by democrats to follow republicans deeper and deeper into the right wing because as long as democrats are slightly less fascist, they’re technically the “better choice”. Now we’re at the point where democrats are full-throatedly supporting genocide. You know, something that literal nazis are known for. Put that in your notes.

    • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Thanks to you and people like you the genocide will increase and even speed up and spread out

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        How? I voted for Harris. It was the democrats who supported genocide and then lost against a clown for the second time.