• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    YT is the one I’m mixed on, on one hand, the ads are annoying AF if you’re not premium and they’re becoming more user hostile towards ad blocking every day

    But on the other hand, hosting and providing bandwidth for video is not cheap. Hosting and providing bandwidth AND allowing users to upload whatever they want no matter the length (I think there’s a limit of 10 hours, which is MORE than generous IMO) OR quality (seriously, who even has the setup to watch 8k videos lol) is REALLY NOT CHEAP

    So who else other than Google can provide what YT provides at scale?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      YouTube also lost billions for years and years. Not certain they’ve turned an overall profit yet.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I’m guessing it probably does. It brings in like $30,000,000,000+ a year. What it actually costs to run is seemingly a closely guarded secret, but I’d probably say it’s a fair amount less than the thirty billion, since they aren’t having to pay a third party company or anything for hosting any of it.