• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    The Madagascar plan was the Nazis and explicitly designed to starve them all to death. I assume the Tasmanian idea is similar in goal. “Hey, this area will technically fit them all, we don’t need to check how much of the land is arable ;)”

    I don’t think you could create a sovereign space for a couple million refugees in either Uganda Argentina but feel free to correct me.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think the Tasmania thing was a throw shit at the wall thing. But you could definitely keep a strong population in southern Argentina, that part of Patagonia is pretty fertile.