• state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 hours ago

    In another thread someone said Spotify is paying out 17k per month for her streams. And that’s only Spotify. If she’s making more on OF, that means there are a lot of foot people and the music royalty situation is completely fucked up, because I don’t think the money ends up with her.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I remember reading that Spotify pays out around 4k per day (~120k per month) for her streams but the majority of that payout goes to the rights holder and Allen gets pennies. I think Spotify is paying a reasonable amount (at least in my opinion but I’m far from an expert on the matter) and the music industry is the one screwing her over.

      • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Spotify pays artists less than any major streaming platform (Apple music, tidal, etc.)

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Do they actually pay less or do they pay less per stream? Because those two things are not the same.

    • nshibj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m not saying that’s wrong, because I don’t have the information, but I have repeatedly read on different news articles that Spotify pays peanuts: way less than that to big artists. I will have to check for updated and reliable sources.

      • Dupree878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They don’t pay as well as Apple and Tidal but they pay much better than YouTube

        When you’re indy you don’t make money from streaming. When you’re actually popular you do, but the record company gets it. It’s like when hard partying rockstars used to all go broke. It’s because they made millions but the corporations took it all and made them pay back the recording and partying costs out of their meager earnings. Then if the band was bust the company would write off the expenses as a loss while still collecting from the artists’ share.

        For Taylor Swift’s 1999 album, there was an article that showed Spotify had paid millions to the record company and Swift got about $200. That’s why she’s re-recording everything as “Taylor’s version.” So she can get the revenue.

        The singer of Cracker showed his earnings from streaming the song Low one month and TouTube had way more views than any streamer and had paid pennies. Seriously it was like .32.

        My last check from streaming was $12 and that was only split two ways.

        • nshibj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Thank you, I didn’t know that. I know that record labels have been screwing artists for decades… but I didn’t know that Spotify was actually paying good money for the listens, it just doesn’t reach the artist.

          • XTL@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There’s been years of anti Spotify propaganda. It’s not surprising that it sticks.