Summary

Anti-Trump Americans, especially on the left, are showing a more subdued response to Trump’s 2024 reelection compared to the activism of 2016.

Exhaustion, disillusionment with repeated setbacks, and negative media coverage have led many to disengage from politics or shift focus to personal priorities.

Activist groups, like Women’s March, are planning protests but acknowledge lower enthusiasm and more localized efforts.

Experts suggest this “tune-out” may be a coping mechanism, with some hoping new, non-political participants will lead change.

Many feel drained but believe activism will eventually regain momentum.

  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    And honestly the worst part is: where is the dem leadership right now? Where has Harris been since her defeat? People should have accepted blame for this historic loss and stepped down, but instead - nothing. What the hell is this?

    • havocpants@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They lost, what do you expect them to do? Foment an insurrection? The American people have spoken and they chose 4 years of a fascist, rapist, lying criminal for a president.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        what do you expect them to do?

        the person to whom you replied was perfectly clear on this:

        People should have accepted blame for this historic loss and stepped down

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        The very very low bar that everyone should have for the Democrats right now is to expect them to be furiously working to win the House and the Senate in the next midterm election. Like balls to the wall, all out. Anything less is completely acquiescing to trumpism.

        You want more? They should be strategizing how to flip state legislatures. They should be working on lower levers of government from the bottom up, to fight gerrymandering and electoral shenanigans.

        And these are just the normie political stuff. I’m not even going to get into the grassroots organizing, movement building, leadership development, labour organizing etc.

        Franklin did tell you, from the very start: “a republic if you can keep it”. Do you want to keep it?

        My two Canadian cents, take it or leave it.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I expect them to still show leadership, to try and bring hope to their constituents - and to take responsibility for the election loss.

        What kind of leader just up and leaves after a loss like this? Did Bernie just fuck off after everything that happened to him? No, he’s still there, still trying to build support and help younger politicians follow in his footsteps. Harris should be doing that or should resign, not whatever she’s doing now.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Bernie is in a position where he actually does something. Vice President is a bench-warming position with no real power.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Doctors are just fake jobs, everyone knows it’s the nurses who do all the work that’s why my surgeon didn’t even show up to my appendectomy.

            If everyone treated their job like Democrats do theirs, the world wouldn’t work.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Harris isn’t just the vice president, she was the presidential candidate. For fucks sake, she wanted to be the Democrats leader for the next couple of years! She has way more power and influence compared to Bernie.

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              She has way more power and influence compared to Bernie.

              I don’t see how, since she’s a failed candidate and the VP of a lame duck president. You’re not wrong that she could at least make an attempt to have some sort of message of resistance, but even if she did it wouldn’t have any practical effect. Milquetoast centrist is milquetoast.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I don’t see how your position makes sense. Not only was there literally a $1.4bn dollar campaign promoting her over the last few months, she also dictated the current direction of the DNC based on her campaign policies and promises. She’s VP to a government whose policies she largely supported in her campaign. There hasn’t been any broad renouncement of her.

                Besides Biden, who has anywhere close to her power, both in the party and in the public eye? She should be using all of the focus to promote and support new & fresh Democrats. You can’t seriously try to tell me she has less power than Bernie.