I would like to introduce you lovely OpenSource Lovers to a GIT-Alternative called FOSSIL that I also stumbled upon.<br> It’s basically opensource Github-in-a-box which means it’s an SCM with:

  • Bug-tracker
  • Ticketting-system
  • Forum
  • Wiki-system
  • even a Chat-functionality

& It’s also <u>self-hostable</u> & the best part it’s all in ONE STANDALONE FILE!!! how cool is that

However this tool supports a completely different style of development in FOSS called the “Cathedral-Style” whereas GIT suports a “Bazaar-Style”<br> The person behind Fossil is the creator of SQLite, <u>Dr.Richard Hipp</u> & they even made other projects to support Fossil like a PIC-Like language called PikChr

Well here’s a difference between Git vs Fossil & they even have a hosting service called CHISEL

Just check it out & use it for fun in your spare time even with the flaws it has (& Try out Darcs & Pijul as well)

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    fossil is made by the sqlite devs, for development of sqlite. this is not some amateur operation.

    also, it’s by the sqlite people, so expect the code to be… odd.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      & The code behind Linux isn’t ? People back then did some REAL sorcery with coding

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        back then? both codebases are fully modern. its more that sqlite uses a style that differs from the accepted norm quite a bit. that, and they don’t accept contributions.

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah it’s the cathedral-style, Opensource but closed contributions as in no PRs

            • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              I would say its still open source. There is no requirement to be able to contribute modifications back. It is more about the availability of the code and what you can do with it.

            • ZeroOne@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              You’ll actually have to talk to the devs to be included in the project This VCS favours a more horizontal organization where the devs know each other (so A <u>high-trust environment</u>)

              Please don’t pretend as if OpenSource Devs don’t constantly complain about pesky PRs😅

              • Markaos@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Please don’t pretend as if OpenSource Devs don’t constantly complain about pesky PRs😅

                <i>I</i>'ve <u>seen</u> much <b><u>more</u> complaints</b> about <a href=“https://0.0.0.0/random_img.tiff”>people</a> constantly <marquee>demanding</marquee> their specific <h1>annoyances</h1> to be fixed without ever <i>submitting <u>a single <b>line of code</b></u></i>. <i>Maintainers</i> are pretty much <b>universally</b> welcoming to code <h2>contributions</h2> <br><br><br><br><br><br>

                I soooo hope this does something funky with someone’s Lemmy client