all the people involved in those markets were making decisions distinct from the people making decisions in the milk market. I dont think we can find anything so conclusive.
I’m not going to believe something without evidence. your hand waiving is not evidence, and historical data about irrational actors is not predictive about the future of those same markets. it can’t be reliable evidence about the future in a separate market.
all the people involved in those markets were making decisions distinct from the people making decisions in the milk market. I dont think we can find anything so conclusive.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Here’s the test, everyone stops buying milk. Go.
did it work?
You still don’t understand basic markets, huh. That’s unfortunate.
I understand that markets are populated by irrational actors.
That’s not relevant. This issue is more basic than that. It’s the most basic.
Out of morbid curiosity. Hypotheticaly, why or how do you think a producer would continue to operate at full scale with no buyers?
saying it’s basic is hand waiving. say what you mean.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I’m not going to believe something without evidence. your hand waiving is not evidence, and historical data about irrational actors is not predictive about the future of those same markets. it can’t be reliable evidence about the future in a separate market.
Removed by mod
calling me names won’t change the truth.
such an experiment would have no bearing on a separate product in a separate market.
@[email protected] 1 month
deleted by creator