return2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoLuigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy"www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1172arrow-down1external-linkLuigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy"www.newsweek.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square17fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareTheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up59·1 day agoMan I hope they can’t find an impartial jury to try this guy, but I know they’ll find 12 bastards.
minus-squareeran_morad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33·1 day agoAll it takes is 1 guy who says the right bullshit.
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-21 day agoi bet they’ll change the venue to the federal circuit so that they can move it to a red state where there’s plenty of boot lickers.
minus-squareWraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 day agoFunny enough, a lot of the right also like the guy for what he did.
minus-squareLennny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·edit-21 day agoThat’s because most red voters actually think blue, they’re just too fucking dumb to know.
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agofortunately so. i suspect that there’s a high prevalence of boot licking among rightists; hence my comment moving to a red state.
minus-squareKyrgizion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoA jury comprised entirely of C-suite people would probably do the job. They’re undoubtedly going to try this.
minus-squareohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 day agoNot a lawyer, but I’d hope there would be an argument against this since a jury of c-suite people would not be his peers.
minus-squarezigmus64@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 day agoThe prosecution and defense have to agree on the jury makeup if I understand the process correctly…
Man I hope they can’t find an impartial jury to try this guy, but I know they’ll find 12 bastards.
All it takes is 1 guy who says the right bullshit.
i bet they’ll change the venue to the federal circuit so that they can move it to a red state where there’s plenty of boot lickers.
Funny enough, a lot of the right also like the guy for what he did.
That’s because most red voters actually think blue, they’re just too fucking dumb to know.
fortunately so.
i suspect that there’s a high prevalence of boot licking among rightists; hence my comment moving to a red state.
A jury comprised entirely of C-suite people would probably do the job. They’re undoubtedly going to try this.
Not a lawyer, but I’d hope there would be an argument against this since a jury of c-suite people would not be his peers.
The prosecution and defense have to agree on the jury makeup if I understand the process correctly…