The European Union is moving closer to enacting a law that will require smartphones like the iPhone to have easier battery repairs.

  • holo_nexus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea there were waterproof phones before most phones pivoted to non-removable right?

    I guess another question is whether manufacturers can reach the same current rating on removable battery phones?

      • ScottTheGeek :verified:@twit.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @RyanHakurei @tojikomori @holo_nexus

        The Samsung Galaxy S5 was IP67 rated and had a removable battery, MicroSD card slot, and headphone jack.

        A better waterproofing rating could be obtained with a screwed-on back panel and gasket. But phone manufacturers are lazy and would rather you buy a new phone when the battery wears out.

        • tojikomori@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A screw-on panel sounds like a good idea to me – a decent balance between replaceability and durability, without overly optimizing for a repair that only happens once or twice in a handset’s lifetime.

          The S5 looked a lot like my first smartphone, and it goes to the other extreme: a flimsy plastic shell over some sturdier plastic that frames the battery and separates its contacts from the phone’s internals. My newer, non-user-replaceable-battery handsets – both Apple and Android – have held together a lot better using fewer materials more judiciously.

          A sweet spot between these extremes (“you need 80 lbs of specialized equipment to replace the battery safely” vs. “let’s pretend people need to swap out phone batteries like AAs”) could be good for me, but I want to know about the trade-offs. Too often legislators and right-to-repair advocates talk as though there are none. Even with a screw-on panel, I’m sure there are trade-offs.