The implication is that disproportionately helping black people is somehow problematic. The article itself is actually much more sympathetic. Makes me wonder if it wasn’t an editorial decision.
Compare:
How Federal Ruling To Wipe Medical Debt From Credit Reports Helps Address Historic Inequality
The implication is that disproportionately helping black people is somehow problematic. The article itself is actually much more sympathetic. Makes me wonder if it wasn’t an editorial decision.
Compare:
The article from a liberal Black news site is racist against Black people?
Do people read article before commenting? It literally goes into the history of racism that caused this.
Speaking of not reading…
I literally pointed out that the title is incongruous with the rest of the article. Did you bother reading my whole comment before replying?
Ha, I actually did misread your comment lol
All good! :)