Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoProblem solved.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square271linkfedilinkarrow-up1727arrow-down141
arrow-up1686arrow-down1external-linkProblem solved.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square271linkfedilink
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up116arrow-down1·4 months agoAlso: why not give Texas back to Mexico? It’d solve their obsession with “the border problem.”
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up96·4 months agoBecause Mexico already has enough problems without having to deal with Texans?
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·4 months agoBut think of all the oil they could sell to the US!
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·4 months agoThere are Texans on top of that oil.
minus-squareFundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoThey would just move back into the Us. And with the settlers gone, indigenous people may be allowed ot move back.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agowaves hand minor inconvenience.
Also: why not give Texas back to Mexico? It’d solve their obsession with “the border problem.”
Because Mexico already has enough problems without having to deal with Texans?
But think of all the oil they could sell to the US!
There are Texans on top of that oil.
They would just move back into the Us. And with the settlers gone, indigenous people may be allowed ot move back.
waves hand minor inconvenience.