Around 75% of immigrant farm workers in Bakersfield, California, ditched their shifts after Trump ramped up his threats by removing protections against ICE raids in “sensitive areas,” including schools and workplaces.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Mmm, can’t wait to pay $15 for produce. Fucking idiot Americans voting against their own interests.

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the real issue is we’re using undocumented immigrants to do these jobs. They don’t get the same protections that legal workers get.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Absolutely, but we are well past people using logic and reason. We wouldn’t be in this situation in the first place, and we could have spent time actually solving legal immigration (among many other things) instead of years of focus on her emails and all the nonsense of 2016-2020.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That may be an underlying issue but when the baby is incessantly screaming and crying, it doesn’t help to throw boiling water on it

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Didn’t some morons vote for trump literally because of the egg prices?

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anyone I know who voted for trump for “economic reasons” are people I know to have the weakest grasp on what economic factors determine the price of eggs.

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Let me start to say that I’m on our side (probably), but are you implying that you want those workers to be underpaid and have no worker rights so your produce price stays low?

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This has always been a complex dynamic.

        For example, is it wrong for me to buy Tuna tinned in South East Asia? The people working there have few rights and are paid a pittance for their work. That said, it’s a highly sought after job because the other jobs available in the area are far worse.

        Really we’re talking about labor arbitrage. Whether or not the labor actually happens locally or in a foreign jurisdiction, laborers residing in a poorer jurisdiction are selling their labor to people in a wealthier one.

        I think the answer to whether or not it’s “ok” is firstly a personal one, (maybe I’m ok with it while others aren’t), but also dependent on the degree of difference.

        It might be ok to buy tinned Tuna from a company that invests in foreign communities and pays employees a living wage with good terms, but probably not ok to buy tinned Tuna from a company that chains employees to machines for 16 hours a day before allowing them to return to their cage-box.

        What I’m saying is, I’m ok with foreign workers being paid less provided that it’s not exploitative, which is subjective.